|
Erase Files and Internet Activity, Pictures, URLs, Videos, Email,
Chats, Voice, Peer to Peer, "locked" Windows Files, Browser
History, Newsgroups, Wipe Free Space and more.

|
:: delete index.dat
::
|
 |
Erase Internet Explorer index.dat files |
INDEX.DAT data files a specially formatted type of
data file used by Internet Explorer to contain URLs and other
reference data. They should not arbitrarily be deleted as some
contain critical Offline (or Subscription) Cache information.
|
|
::
address autocomplete ::
|
 |
Erase 'autocomplete' site addresses |
AutoComplete - is the feature of Internet Explorer that attempts
to save one some keystrokes during the keying into the URL Address
field. It presumes to complete the URL based on Visited URLs
from the History INDEX.DAT file.
|
|
::
c window temp ::
|
 |
Erase Windows Temp Directories |
Temporary Internet Files - the files such as Web pages and
graphics files that are stored on your hard disk as they are
retrieved from the Internet as you view them.
|
|
::
clear browser cache ::
|
 |
Erase Browser Cache Files |
| Cache the collection of Temporary Internet Files |
|
::
browser cookie ::
|
 |
Erase Browser Cookies |
Cookies are small Text files that are written to a
users hard disk by their Web Browser. The cookies are
generated by the Web-site being visited.
|
|
:: clear browser
history ::
|
 |
Erase Browser History |
| History Folders are folders that contain History information
for Web-Sites you have visited. |
100% Vista compatible Privacy Suite software supports Internet
Explorer 7 and Firefox 3.x.
System Requirements
- Windows® Me/NT/2000/XP/Vista (all versions)
- 16 MB RAM
- Pentium or above
- 14 MB free disk space
"..Digital evidence can be collected from many sources. Obvious
sources include computers, cell phones, digital cameras, hard drives,
CD-ROM, USB memory devices, and so on. Non-obvious sources include
settings of digital thermometers, black boxes inside automobiles,
RFID tags, and web pages (which must be preserved as they are subject
to change).
Special care must be taken when handling computer evidence: most
digital information is easily changed, and once changed it is usually
impossible to detect that a change has taken place (or to revert
the data back to its original state) unless other measures have
been taken. For this reason it is common practice to calculate a
cryptographic hash of an evidence file and to record that hash elsewhere,
usually in an investigator's notebook, so that one can establish
at a later point in time that the evidence has not been modified
since the hash was calculated.
Other specific practices that have been adopted in the handling
of digital evidence include:
- Handle the original evidence as little as possible to avoid
changing the data.
- Establish and maintain the chain of custody.
- Documenting everything that has been done.
- Only use tools and methods that have been tested and evaluated
to validate their accuracy and reliability.
Some of the most valuable information obtained in the course of
a forensic examination will come from the computer user. An interview
with the user can yield valuable information about the system configuration,
applications, encryption keys and methodology. Forensic analysis
is much easier when analysts have the user's passphrases to access
encrypted files, containers, and network servers.
In an investigation in which the owner of the digital evidence
has not given consent to have his or her media examined (as in some
criminal cases) special care must be taken to ensure that the forensic
specialist has the legal authority to seize, copy, and examine the
data. Sometimes authority stems from a search warrant. As a general
rule, one should not examine digital information unless one has
the legal authority to do so. Amateur forensic examiners should
keep this in mind before starting any unauthorized investigation.
All digital evidence must be analyzed to determine the type of
information that is stored upon it. For this purpose, specialty
tools are used that can display information in a format useful to
investigators. Such forensic tools include: AccessData's FTK, Guidance
Software's EnCase, and Brian Carrier's Sleuth Kit. In many investigations,
numerous other tools are used to analyze specific portions of information.
Typical forensic analysis includes a manual review of material on
the media, reviewing the Windows registry for suspect information,
discovering and cracking passwords, keyword searches for topics
related to the crime, and extracting e-mail and images for review
.."
http:// en. wikipedia. org/ wiki/ Computer_forensics
"..Computer Online Forensic Evidence Extractor (COFEE) is
a modified USB flash drive for investigators for quick extraction
of forensic data from computers that are suspected to contain evidence
of criminal activity. It allows investigators to search through
data onsite as an automated forensic tool. The device, developed
by Microsoft, is activated by being plugged into a USB port, and
purportedly contains 150 commands that can dramatically cut the
time it takes to gather digital evidence (estimates cited by Microsoft
state that a job that previously took 3-4 hours can be done with
COFEE in as little as 20 minutes). These commands offer such functions
as the ability to decrypt passwords, search a computer's Internet
activity, and analyze the data stored on a computer - including
data stored in volatile memory, which could be lost if the computer
were shut down for transport to a lab. Microsoft currently provides
COFEE devices and online technical support free to law enforcement
agencies.
COFEE was developed by Anthony Fung, a former Hong Kong police
officer who now works as a senior investigator on Microsoft's Internet
Safety Enforcement Team. Fung conceived of the device following
discussions he had at a 2006 law enforcement technology conference
sponsored by Microsoft. The device is used by more than 2,000 officers
in at least 15 countries.
A case cited by Microsoft in April 2008 credits COFEE as being
crucial in a New Zealand investigation into the trafficking of child
pornography, producing evidence that led to an arrest .."
http:// en. wikipedia. org/ wiki/ Computer_Online_Forensic_Evidence_Extractor
"..File wiping utilities are used to delete individual files
from an operating system. The advantage of file wiping utilities
is that they can accomplish their task in a relatively short amount
of time as opposed to disk cleaning utilities which take much longer.
Another advantage of file wiping utilities is that they generally
leave a much smaller signature than disk cleaning utilities. There
are two primary disadvantages of file wiping utilities, first they
require user involvement in the process and second some experts
believe that file wiping programs don't always correctly and completely
wipe file information. Some of the widely used file wiping utilities
include R-Wipe & Clean, Eraser, Aevita Wipe & Delete and
CyberScrubs PrivacySuite.
http:// en. wikipedia. org/ wiki/ Anti-computer_forensics
|